ïClickð   
    
      
    
      
    
    
      
    
    
      
    
      
    
      
     | 
     | 
    
    Under sail
    Various pictures of the J105 beating under genoa and main 
    
Beating under 140% genoa #2 and class main; 2002 Governor's Cup The #1 genoa 155% and class main; July 2003 Screwpile Upwind; July 2003 Screwpile  
 
Beating under 140% genoa #2 and class main; 2002 Governor's Cup  
 
 
  
    Discussion on the offshore capabilities of the 
    J105
    Extracts from
    
    http://www.j105.org/~oldforum/discus/messages/4/49.html?1052765664#POST1015 
    
      
        | Jose R. Villalon Mazatlan, Mexico
         Posted on Wednesday, November 21, 2001 - 8:14 pm:   | 
        I 
        currently club-race a 1976 C&C38 and am considering purchasing a used 
        J105. I was attracted to the 105 for the ease of sailing it shorthanded. 
        However I live in Mexico and OD is out of the question. I will be racing 
        under PHRF. I am also interested in campaigning oceanic doublehanded 
        races such as the Newport-Bermuda and possibly the Pineapple Cup. Would 
        the 105´s OD characteristics be a hindrance for PHRF racing? Or does the 
        ease of doublehanded A-sail use offset any speed given up to masthead 
        rigged PHRFérs. Is this a good and PHRF competitive offshore boat? 
        Thanks for your feedback...  
        Jose R. Villalon  
        C&C 38-Galapagos | 
       
      
        | Jaffar Bentchikou / Annapolis
         Posted on Thursday, November 22, 2001 - 3:41 pm:   | 
        Jose, here 
        are a few elements to consider.  
         
        • The ease of sailing the J/105 is true. A doublehanded J/105 class has 
        been introduced in 2001 in Annapolis and had a few point-to-point races 
        on the schedule (no real offshore race yet).  
        • The A-spin is a big plus for point-to-point races with lots of 
        reaching.  
        • PHRF ratings do not vary with the wind. The J/105 with class sails has 
        a very unfavorable rating in light air (below 5 kn any genoa boat in the 
        class will beat any J/105; from 5 to 10 the gap decreases) and a very 
        favorable one in heavy air (above 15-20 kn the J/105 has few competitors 
        in the same PHRF class).  
        • You can use a genoa with the J/105 but the wide chainplate base 
        prevents the boat from pointing well above 8-9 kn of wind.  
        • You can of course use a larger A-spin for PHRF races. The current 
        class size of 77 m2 is quite small for the boat but will be increased to 
        89 m2 in 2002. Many J/105s racing PHRF go all the way and use a 110 m2 
        A-spinnaker.  
        • There is an easy way to have a masthead rigged A-spinnaker on a J/105 
        if, and it is a big if, you have one French-built J/105 (I own one). 
        These boats have a Sparcraft mast which is much stronger from the hounds 
        up and the spinnaker halyard exits the mast at the top and then goes 
        down through a couple of U-bolts on the front of the mast at the class 
        legal height. So, changing from class setup to masthead setup for PHRF 
        is quite easy.  
        • I am also considering doing one offshore race (Annapolis-Bermuda) with 
        my J/105 and I was puzzled by the fact that very few J/105s have entered 
        known offshore races while its predecessor, the J/35, has a good track 
        record offshore (even winning the Sydney-Hobart in her class!). Most 
        sailing pros I have discussed the subject with explain the difference by 
        the lack of comfort in the cabin for an offshore crew spending several 
        days and nights racing. There is no question that the hull and the rig 
        can do a good job there but there is no headroom in the cabin and the 
        alcohol stove is not gimbaled in the TPI-built units.  
        • As a side comment to the preceding point, the French-built J/105s have 
        again a slight plus as they come from the factory with a more 
        comfortable interior and a 2-burner gimbaled propane stove.  
        • I also would be much interested if other J/105 owners with offshore 
        experience would care to comment. | 
       
      
        | Jaffar Bentchikou / Annapolis
         Posted on Thursday, November 22, 2001 - 4:09 pm:   | 
        I forgot 
        to mention in my posting that you could also use a Code Zero A-spinnaker 
        for close reaching legs. I have one with my new J/105 Chantecler. Its 
        range of use is relatively narrow (close reaching to broad reaching) but 
        when you can use it is a killer as your competitors are close reaching 
        under jib or genoa. The sail is a class-legal spinnaker but its best use 
        is for PHRF racing where you can change spinnakers during the race (not 
        permitted for class races).  
         
        Jaffar  
         
        homepage at ..\index.htm | 
       
      
        | 
         Mike Tucker Hamilton Bermuda  
        Posted on Friday, November 23, 2001 - 5:26 pm:   | 
        I concur 
        with the last two messages. Here in Bermuda two of the boats have 
        reaching A-spinnakers from Doyle (not quite Code 0)and we usually sail 
        under IMS. At the right moment the performance is outstanding. Can't use 
        the reachers in really high wind though.  
         
        We now have 3 French boats in Bermuda and the internal layout is much 
        better. I have done two short ocean hops in varied weather and the 
        position of the stove,sink and cooler make a big difference. Headroom 
        will always be an issue and we can't pretend she is a Swan when 
        reaching. The dodger is essential for long distance work. But in one 
        race we came back from the deep blue running along the wave crests for 3 
        hours largely at 15.5 knots - smiles all round and a real roller coaster 
        ride galloping down the big ocean swell.  
         
        I haven't used the mast head spinnaker halyard except in light air. We 
        use the 110 chute a lot and in light airs it touches the water unless we 
        haul it up to the mast head. While the French mast is stronger above the 
        hounds, we believe it looks suspiciously like a Euro J120 mast which 
        uses running back stays so we haven't pushed the higher halyard in heavy 
        air. We also just made a local class decision to remove the mast head 
        halyard to make us even with the TPI built boats.  
        Mike Joji BER205 | 
       
      
        | Jose R. Villalon Mazatlan, Mexico
         Posted on Saturday, November 24, 2001 - 2:13 pm:   | 
        Many 
        thanks for the complete feedback Jaffar and Mike. I am beginning to feel 
        more confident in my bias towards the J105. I guess the bottom line 
        question is: If you were to sail strickly PHRF buoy races with an 
        occassional PHRF oceanic race and were always sailing shorthanded 
        (between 1 and 4 on boat), would the J105 be your choice? I am convinced 
        that I would set-up with a 155% genoa, adjustable track cars, and a 110m 
        masthead kite; I believe this would make me competitive around the cans. 
        How would one deal with the small cold storage capacity?  
        Rgds,  
        Jose R. Villalon  
        Galapagos | 
       
      
        | Andrew Gillis/Newport
         Posted on Sunday, November 25, 2001 - 5:07 am:   | 
        Jose:  
         
        While I've been sailing for years last year was my first with the j105. 
        That said, expect to point about 5-8 degrees lower (with the genoa 
        versus jib) than than the 27-28 degrees that is possible in most 
        conditions with the jib. Unless the j35s attempt to carry 150s above ~19 
        knots true (when they become overpowered) they will eat you up up wind 
        in most other conditions. Worse still, its not just the j35s but many 
        half-way decent phrf boats that can outpoint a genoa j105. Watching your 
        competitors as though they are riding elevators to windward as you race 
        windward/leewards is a serious tactical disadvantage to say nothing of 
        demoralizing. Because of this covers are far less effective and down 
        right dangerous from a competitive standpoint. The 105 relies on offwind 
        work to make its rating but this is reduced in square leeward course 
        work. With the 110m2 kite at the hounds we saw some slight advantage.
         
         
        I know that the 105 has participated in the Bermuda 1-2 (from newport). 
        However, I don't know if it is allowed to enter the Marion to Bermuda or 
        its biannual partner the Newport to Bermuda race. I suspect it won't be 
        allowed in the last as that race is open to boats with an IMS stability 
        index of 115 or greater. Based on the IMS certificate that I have seen 
        [available on the class site, I think] the 105 has a stability index of 
        about 113.5. I hope that other Bermuda race sponsors take a different 
        stance.  
         
        Given all my harsh words I still have to tell you we love this boat. It 
        is responsive and exciting to sail. It only takes a few reaches at 12-16 
        knots to leave a lasting grin on your face. In flat water the boat does 
        (110m2 kite) 9-11 knots beam reaching in 13-17 knots true (although 
        above 15-16 knots you are overpowered and should change down). Upwind it 
        is very easily driven and can achieve 6 knots in fairly light air. We 
        bought the 105 to one design race and given our few discouraging 
        experiences at PHRF racing the boat this year, we'll probably stick to 
        that.  
         
        Certainly, cold storage is limited and if we have resorted to carrying 
        an extra cooler when we travel for an overnight with 4-5 on board. This 
        isn't entirely satisfactory at sea, but with the cooler on the sole 
        against the rear face of the main bulkhead at least the weight is in the 
        best possible place. I think that freeze dried food or even better 
        Ready-to eat meals would be the only way to go for a 3-5 day offshore 
        race for a crew (or even just 2). | 
       
      
        | Arthur Treach/Oriental, N.C.
         Posted on Sunday, November 25, 2001 - 9:53 am:   | 
        The j105 
        is a great daysailor or one-design racer, but I can't honestly fathom 
        ocean racing in a PHRF fleet. The boat is neither designed for that, nor 
        reasonable equipped to do so. I have raced both PHRF and bouys for seven 
        years, and would encourage anyone who enjoys one-design or daysailing to 
        purchase one. I would discourage an ocean racer to buy one. I would 
        emphatically discourage a PHRF ocean racer to buy one. It's a great 
        boat, and without going into details about flaws for PHRF (which few 
        people do), or flaws about taking her bluewater racing (which some have 
        done, mostly once), I would again discourage a bluewater sailor against 
        a j105. She certainly could handle it, but I was far from happy given 
        the layout-- especially about the scars on my head from the 5'4" 
        headroom. For ocean racing, you must have headroom. You must have a 
        gimballed stove. The j105 is a great boat, and there is not an owner out 
        there that can argue in good conscience about the previous two 
        statements.  
         
        Just make sure you personally take her on an ocean race before you make 
        buy her. Especially now, at the peak of their popularity. This boat is a 
        one-design racer/cruiser and should not be compared with a PHRF champ or 
        ocean racer, but she does what she was designed to do and fits into her 
        niche like a champ.  
         
        Additionally, I believe the minimum LOA for Bermuda races are 35', but 
        check with the race organizer. FWIW, I would politely decline any offer 
        to race 750 miles offshore on this boat. Not because it's not capable, 
        but because it just isn't designed to take the reasonable person that 
        far.  
         
        I don't mean to disparage the j105. She is a beautiful one-design bouy 
        and overnight racer, but one cannot confuse her with an ocean going 
        vessel. In my estimation, I have logged thousands of miles on the j105, 
        varying from 60+ gusts to 0.0 knots. She is a beauty to sail in anything 
        over 10 knots as one design. As far a PHRF, buy a PHRF boat. You will 
        save tens of thousands, even after the sailmaker has had his way with 
        you! Disclaimer: this opinion is worth what you paid for it, but I 
        couldn't help but to chime in given your posts!  
         
        Good luck and fair winds! | 
       
      
        | Jaffar Bentchikou / Annapolis
         Posted on Sunday, November 25, 2001 - 9:21 pm:   | 
        Arthur:
         
         
        The minimum length to enter the 2002 BOR (Annapolis - Bermuda) is 30 
        feet (FAQ). 
        I have not yet decided to enter it because I still have lots of issues 
        to solve, most of them related to cabin and storage space (which may 
        limit the crew to a total of four). As an example, the 2002 NOR (Race 
        & Objectives) 
        requires fuel for 300 nm and water and stores for 10 days. In 2000, 
        boats with comparable PHRF rating did the 756 nm race in less than six 
        days. The boat has not been initially designed to do such races but a 
        look at the J/105 Hall of Fame shows that J/105 sailors have done much 
        longer distances. The key question is 'is it reasonable?' and the answer 
        may depend more on the quality and experience of the crew and on the 
        quality of the preparation than on the J/105 itself.  
         
        Now, I am honored that you have a 'personal observation' from NC on my 
        racing performance around Annapolis. Should I abstain from making any 
        web posting until I reach the top third of the fleet? How many top third 
        of any fleet are contributing to this discussion? I believed that I 
        could contribute to answer Jose's interesting question and I did it 
        without mentioning that I did one Annapolis-Horta (Açores) crossing 
        because it was done on a 45' Jeanneau Sunkiss and thus was not very 
        relevant. I am afraid that this part of your posting, contrarily to the 
        rest, was not very constructive. | 
       
      
        | Art Teach
         Posted on Monday, November 26, 2001 - 8:55 am:   | 
        Jaffar,
         
         
        Don't read this if you are a sensitive man. I communicate in a quite 
        direct way, and as such, you may not like my phraseology (is that a 
        word?). Just keep in mind, it is one salty man's opinion; primarily 
        intended for Jose's benefit, not to disparage anyone.  
         
        I apoligize if you fail to recognize the value of my opinion for Jose, 
        however I assure you it comes from the top third of the Bay fleet. My 
        opining was intended to be quite constructive, but as a pirate, I tend 
        to be a bit edgy on my prose. Please don't be offended, and I doubt my 
        opinion would have surfaced on this thread without your "wrongheaded" 
        (more opining) posting. So, please continue to post as a member of the 
        bottom 2/3 of the racing fleet! ;-) Feel free to correct me if I am 
        wrong regarding the previous claim. Disclaimer: previous partnered boat 
        record and present included.  
         
        Also, I find it interesting that you chose a 45' cruising boat to do 
        your offshore trip to Horta. It was probably a more seamanlike choice 
        than, say a 35' boat with a fixed stove, no headroom, and a stability 
        rating of a J105.  
         
        The j105 regardless, remains to be shown as a solid boat. Quite sound 
        and capable, of course, but then again I have a friend who singlehanded 
        from the Chesapeake to the Azores and then to the Pacific in a wooden 
        handbuilt twenty footer. It is a matter of what is reasonable and 
        seamanly, which may vary by individual, of course. Hey, only one man 
        died on the Mini-transat this year(his empty harness dragging behind his 
        well-trimmed vessel, that's not so bad. Or is it? I believe we agree 
        here.  
         
        I would not recommend offshore singlehanding in general, and my 
        assertion to Jose is that he take his $140k and put it in a bluewater 
        boat, not a daysailor. Assuming, of course, he intends to do ocean 
        races, as he says. Then again, he could buy your j105, right?  
         
        Jaffar, I will see you in Bermuda, if you overcome your issues, which 
        there are plenty. And I have no doubt the boat can make the trek. I 
        suspect I will be sipping a margarita, by the time you make harbor. I 
        will toast you when you arrive!  
         
        Time will tell, and actions are clearly louder than e-chat.  
         
        Best of luck to you (truly). Please don't take my comments personally. I 
        think Jose deserves a realistic perspective, and felt compelled to give 
        him one. The j105 is designed for around the bouys and overnight racing, 
        IMHO. Anyone who disagrees, and I suspect most agree here, should chime 
        in.  
         
        Art | 
       
      
        | Nelson Weiderman J/105 #300
         Posted on Monday, November 26, 2001 - 9:29 am:   | 
        I don't 
        ordinarily do this, but I'll remind you that this is an "Owners Forum". 
        Mr. Treach or Mr. Teach or Mr. Buellizinsky is apparently not an owner 
        and apparently does not know the rules of etiquette for this Forum. I 
        will delete any future posts of this nature. | 
       
      
        | Daniel Heun / Lake Michigan Fleet 5
         Posted on Monday, November 26, 2001 - 1:51 pm:   | 
        I would 
        like to add my perspective to the Handicapped Long Distance racing 
        discussion. Fleet 5 in Lake Michigan used to race in the 300+ mile 
        Chicago to Mackinaw race within a PHRF section with all the sails we 
        could take for the PHRF number. Kevlar Mains and Genoas, over sized 
        Polyester Spinakers were the norm. The problem is that J105 is One 
        design boats. Not many owners wanted to buy PHRF sails for a single, 
        albeit significant race. We could only field around 6 boats on the 
        starting line. PHRF and ODR do not mix well. Fleet 5 decided to change 
        our posture with long distance events and race as a ODR section with 
        J105 ODR sails and rules, except for crew weight and storm sails. This 
        returning to our One desgin roots so to speak has increase boats on the 
        line by a factor of 3. It is important to keep things in perspective, in 
        long distance racing, when you beat your direct ODR competitors, that is 
        something to be proud about, and when you beat a 70 footer on corrected 
        time, that is something to drink about.  
        The Chicago to Mack race committee scores the J105 section separately 
        and is awarded separately as well as scores our ODR rating in IMS 
        against the overall fleet of 300 boats. That way we get section and 
        overall fleet scores.  
        My recommendation for a fleet wishing to organize Long Distance racing - 
        go ODR and get scored separetely, that way you will get more J105s on 
        the starting line. Buying a J105 and making it a PHRF or IMS racer can 
        be done, but the odds of you beating a true PHRF or IMS racer are 
        stacked against you. Don't do it - the J105 is an excellent ODR boat and 
        you can race ODR in long distance race. Race against other J105s like we 
        have done in the Chicago to Mackinaw race and you will be rewarded with 
        more boats on the line.  
        In the question regarding is the J105 a good platform for long distance 
        racing. Yes, if the race is not too long. In lake Michigan, we carry 
        food, water, safety gear, anchors, duffle bags, storm sails for six crew 
        for three days. With all the stuff, it begins to get crowded. Six to 
        eight days on a J105 racing with 4 to 5 or 6 crew will be really pushing 
        it. I my opinion, it just doesn't sound fun for six to eight days. We 
        have a category 2 list that must be used for long distance racing to 
        give you an idea of cost.  
        
        http://j105.org/fleet5/category2.htm  
         
        Now a J120 is a different matter........... | 
       
      
        | Bill Hunt/Rhapsody 487/Boothbay Harbor, ME
         Posted on Monday, November 26, 2001 - 11:11 pm:   | 
        I did some 
        testing with my boat (#487) with Ullman Jib alone vs. Witch (#200) with 
        North 150 genoa. I was actually driving Witch during the test and while 
        the jib definitely out points the genny, up to about 11 knots the genny 
        had better VMG to weather. After that test I am very tempted to get a 
        145% or so that is cut to clear the top spreader, I think that would 
        make a sufficient difference to gain back much of the lost pointing 
        without losing significant speed. Has anyone got experience with this 
        type of cut?  
         
        BTW: If the conditions are right, nothing will touch a J/105. Labor day 
        weekend Rhapsody and Witch finished 1,2 boat for boat and 1, 3 corrected 
        in a 17 boat fleet that included a Farr 43 among others. The Farr 
        finished 3rd boat for boat about 3 minutes behind Witch and 7 behind us 
        on Rhapsody. Rhapsody was sailed by myself, my wife and my 13 year old 
        daughter. This was a non-spinnaker race using class main and jib on both 
        105's. The Farr was carrying a full genoa. | 
       
      
        | Ben Jatlow, Annapolis
         Posted on Saturday, December 01, 2001 - 2:26 pm:   | 
        This 
        message is for Art Teach. My name is Ben Jatlow and I sail on/take care 
        of Osprey, #106. Although I rarely post messages in the J/105 forum I 
        read the input weekly. I have never met Jaffar, but as a fellow Fleet 3 
        sailor, I feel that I need to say something here. First of all, I agree 
        with Jaffar in that the J/105 (french or american), is perfectly capable 
        boat of sailing to Bermuda. The abilities of the crew on board only 
        dictate the pleasure of the trip and the speed in getting there. Your 
        remark about Airbus' being build in France is ridiculous. That crash has 
        nothing to do with French people's sailing ability or ability to build a 
        boat (if French J/105's were not seaworthy, J/Boats wold not licenece 
        them to be made there). Besides, wasn't that crash was Airbus' first 
        crash in 25 years? Second, I would like to say something about your 
        comments to Jaffar as to the validity of his postings becausue of his 
        standing in the fleet. Someones bouy racing results do not reflect their 
        offshore sailing capabilities at all. I will use my father as an 
        example. Being only 17 years old, I still live with him. He has always 
        been a crusier who has several thousand miles of ocean sailing 
        experience. If my dad was to skipper a J/105 in any J/105 event, he 
        would most likely be at the bottom of the pack, however if there was a 
        J/105 start in the Bermuda racen and he competed in that (with the same 
        crew as if he skippered a bouy race), his result would most likely be at 
        the top of the fleet. Another point is that you seemed to minimize 
        Jaffar's offshore passaage to Horta becasue it was in a 45 foot cruising 
        boat. I beleive the brand was Jeanneau. From what I know about the two 
        boats, I would feel safer in the J/105 than the Jeanneau. My last point 
        is about your margarita statement. Just becsaue someone has issues to 
        work out before a race such as the Bermuda race does not mean they are 
        going to do bad or have trouble if thats what you were implying. This 
        forum is very helpful to many J/105 sailors and remarks like the ones 
        you made are just not needed, especially if you are not affliated with a 
        J/105. If you are, those kind of remarks still are not needed. That 
        said, I think Jaffar gave Jose some good points to think about and good 
        luck to both of them in the future.  
         
        Ben Jatlow  
        Annapolis, MD | 
       
      
        | Jaffar Bentchikou /#536 Chantecler /Annapolis
         Posted on Monday, May 12, 2003 - 1:54 pm:   | 
        I came 
        across the old discussion above while searching the board on something 
        else.  
         
        As an epilogue, I would like to say that I did the 2002 
        Annapolis-Bermuda race on Chantecler together with a couple of other 
        J/105s.  
         
        Chantecler was first to finish in Division III. Details are at :
        ..\Sail\2002_BOR.htm 
         
        Thank you again Nelson and Ben. | 
       
     
    As a P.S. to the epilogue, I would be very surprised if the person 
    posting under the pseudonym of Art Teach and who 'knew' me and my boat so 
    well was not Bill B., a team member who raced for me on Jay Boat for about 
    one season in 1999-2000. He had some qualities, but 'team player' was not 
    among them and the disruption was so bad that we had to part ways. Here is 
    my final email to him.  
    
      
        | From: Jaffar Sent: 26 JUN 06 
        Subject: Yesterday race  | 
        Teammates: Results are not posted yet 
        but there is no doubt that we were at the very bottom of the fleet. The 
        wind recorded at Thomas Point was a steady 18-23 knots from 160-170 
        during the full race. It looked like the last day of the NOOD, but, even 
        though we were at a perfect crew weight this time, a breakdown in 
        communication and teamwork at the back of the boat prevented us to have 
        the better result we were hoping at the start of the race. We have also 
        tried to use a takedown line and this was another failure, with the 
        spinnaker floating freely twice and only the wonderful damage control 
        skills of Paul saved our new spinnaker and prevented a much larger 
        ground loss at the leeward mark. Fortunately we had decided to douse 
        early. Unfortunately Paul injured his bicep in the process. Paul, you 
        have a big heart and I wish you prompt recovery. Let me know how you are 
        doing. 
        For the first time in 7 years of racing, I did not enjoy the race. 
        The wind was on the strong side but this was the kind of weather where 
        J105s are known to excel. Well, not us, anyway (my partner John has good 
        success in this kind of weather). We had major main trim problems, it 
        gave us a narrow or nonexistent groove, we were constantly falling into 
        boats below us and I constantly overcompensated on the pinching side 
        which also gave relief to the unusual weather helm we had most of the 
        time. The synergy was negative between Bill, Barbara and myself in the 
        back of the boat. 
        Bill, you wanted to be given the full responsibility to trim the main 
        but when it did not work out you refused to cooperate with me in finding 
        what was wrong. Your attitude is disruptive. I believe now, thinking 
        clearly about it, that our major problem was that the backstay was too 
        tight. Your solution was to ease the cunningham, which had for direct 
        consequence to pull the draft aft and to reduce the steering groove to 
        negative numbers. You had so much trouble with the traveler's lines, the 
        coarse and fine mainsheets that your weight was often too far off the 
        rail. 
        Barbara, the experiment with you as a full time strategist and part 
        time helm reliever might have been better if we did not have our 
        problems with the main. You have, correctly, focused your attention at 
        times on improving our main trim but did not contribute much to a 
        possible solution. You focused on the minor problem of the bubble at the 
        luff of the main when our major problem was that the leech inverted 
        along the head to clew diagonal. You refused to cooperate with me in 
        solving the problem and kept nagging me about my steering. In the past, 
        I thought that I could live with your overcritical attitude and that we 
        will have to learn to cooperate and get a good synergy out of this 
        cooperation. But yesterday's race showed that you were guessing as much 
        as Bill on main trim, that the synergy objective was a long way off and 
        that above all it was not going to be fun. 
        So, Barbara and Bill, you have been with us, on and off, for a year 
        or more. I have enjoyed most races with you and you have made efforts 
        and sacrifices for the week-end races of the team, for which I thank you 
        sincerely. I think however that it is time to take advantage of the July 
        break to rebuild the core team around Janet, Tim and Paul in order to 
        improve its cohesiveness. 
        Janet, we will give up on using the takedown line. The wind was 
        unfortunately a bit too strong before the start to practice well this 
        time, but next time, we will work on the takedowns in order to 
        facilitate your job, a critical one. 
        Tim, we had turned the engine on and were ready to leave when you 
        arrived. I know you are one of the steadiest team member, but next time 
        try to give me one confirmation before the race, either by email or 
        phone so that we can comfortably wait for you if you hit some unexpected 
        problem the morning of the race. 
        Jaffar  | 
       
     
      
      
    
      
        
        
            | The first page 
          of my J/105 subweb |  
            | The major 
          features of J105 hull #536 |  
            | 
          Don't miss this important technical bulletin on rudder bearings, 
          companionway slider stop, hull to deck joint, mast tuning and mast 
          bend, engine stop cable, bowsprit seals, and battery specs |  
            | The second 
          launch of my J-105 in Baltimore, from shrink wrap and cradle to the 
          water |  
            | The anchor 
          well, the bow sprit seals, the gimbaled two-burner propane stove, the 
          three sea berths with lee clothes, the instruments, the sails and 
          other details of the J105 |  
         
         | 
        
        
            | The V-berth, 
          the mast step, the sinks, the navigation table, the stove area, and 
          other views from the interior of the J/105 |  
            | The J105 
          under sail, upwind with genoa and main |  
            | The J 105 
          wheel, instrument remote, propane bottle locker, the genoa tracks, the 
          triple cabin top rope clutches, the foot rest for the main trimmer, 
          and the cabin top instrument cluster |  
            | The 
          J/105 masthead, the Sparcraft mast, which permits masthead asymmetric 
          spinnakers and the forehatch. |  
         
         | 
       
      
        
    
     
        This is my homepage | 
        
        To contact the webmasterïClickð    | 
       
      
        
    Something different
    Are you looking to buy a larger and more comfortable center cockpit 
    cruiser? 
    Try: 
    http://erodier2.home.comcast.net/Morgan4Sale/ 
    This boat is being sold by Ed Rodier, who is a member of Team Chantecler 
         | 
        
        Chantecler logo 
        (design by Salima Bentchicou-Gonord,
        Architecte DESA) 
           | 
       
     
      
       |